<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Signifying Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.signifyingmedia.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net</link>
	<description>Semiotic Considerations on Traditional and New Media -- Semiotische Überlegungen zu traditionellen und neuen Medien</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:20:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Double-Plus Real Names by packard</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/08/googles-double-plus-real-names/comment-page-1/#comment-4017</link>
		<dc:creator>packard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2307#comment-4017</guid>
		<description>I think #1, #2 and #3 are all incorrect, but only sometimes. That&#039;s pretty much the current confusion. If someone can show they have been using a handle for a long time on their own blogs etc., Google has often accepted that as justification -- and in other similar cases, it hasn&#039;t. Though I admit KirkIsMyHero23 is probably at the far end of the scale, with 50 Cent at a very low end.

Good luck with Conan 776!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think #1, #2 and #3 are all incorrect, but only sometimes. That&#8217;s pretty much the current confusion. If someone can show they have been using a handle for a long time on their own blogs etc., Google has often accepted that as justification &#8212; and in other similar cases, it hasn&#8217;t. Though I admit KirkIsMyHero23 is probably at the far end of the scale, with 50 Cent at a very low end.</p>
<p>Good luck with Conan 776!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Double-Plus Real Names by Conan776</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/08/googles-double-plus-real-names/comment-page-1/#comment-4016</link>
		<dc:creator>Conan776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2307#comment-4016</guid>
		<description>Your #2 is simply incorrect. They&#039;ve made exceptions for nyms that look like real names, but something like KirkIsMyHero23 would never fly. &lt;a href=&quot;https://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/d/topic/google-plus-discuss/ltmJoO2EgM4/discussion&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I should know!&lt;/a&gt; Although, you&#039;ve inspired me to try again with &quot;Conan 776&quot; as my first and last name -- I had previously tried &quot;Conan Seven-Seven-Six&quot; as numbers weren&#039;t allowed. They seem to have changed that policy &lt;a href=&quot;https://plus.google.com/114809488257853535663/posts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for a certain elite&lt;/a&gt;. We&#039;ll see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your #2 is simply incorrect. They&#8217;ve made exceptions for nyms that look like real names, but something like KirkIsMyHero23 would never fly. <a href="https://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/d/topic/google-plus-discuss/ltmJoO2EgM4/discussion" rel="nofollow">I should know!</a> Although, you&#8217;ve inspired me to try again with &#8220;Conan 776&#8243; as my first and last name &#8212; I had previously tried &#8220;Conan Seven-Seven-Six&#8221; as numbers weren&#8217;t allowed. They seem to have changed that policy <a href="https://plus.google.com/114809488257853535663/posts" rel="nofollow">for a certain elite</a>. We&#8217;ll see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Double-Plus Real Names by K</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/08/googles-double-plus-real-names/comment-page-1/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2307#comment-4010</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just incredibly pissed that whatever you use for Google+ will automatically be what&#039;s seen via, e-mail, docs, and Google ID.  I honestly have no problems using my real name for Google+, but I don&#039;t want to give up the pseudonym I&#039;ve been using for half a decade or so through Google ID.  Maybe I could use that pseudonym as my Google Plus name, but I actually WANT to use my real name for Google Plus and socialize through it that way.

My main issue with this has been Google&#039;s &quot;piss off!&quot; attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just incredibly pissed that whatever you use for Google+ will automatically be what&#8217;s seen via, e-mail, docs, and Google ID.  I honestly have no problems using my real name for Google+, but I don&#8217;t want to give up the pseudonym I&#8217;ve been using for half a decade or so through Google ID.  Maybe I could use that pseudonym as my Google Plus name, but I actually WANT to use my real name for Google Plus and socialize through it that way.</p>
<p>My main issue with this has been Google&#8217;s &#8220;piss off!&#8221; attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wie die Telekom Emails verschickt II by n/a</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/08/wie-die-telekom-emails-verschickt-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-3982</link>
		<dc:creator>n/a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2321#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>Waaaaaaaahhhhhhh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waaaaaaaahhhhhhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Double-Plus Real Names by Frattanto nella blogosfera #20 &#171; Ok, panico</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/08/googles-double-plus-real-names/comment-page-1/#comment-3908</link>
		<dc:creator>Frattanto nella blogosfera #20 &#171; Ok, panico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2307#comment-3908</guid>
		<description>[...] La strana politica di Google sui nomi reali. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La strana politica di Google sui nomi reali. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent Linkage 14 by nn</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/04/recent-linkage-14/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>nn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=1720#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>zum virtuellen Schengenraum:

http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2011/04/26/datenschmuggel-ist-ein-verbrechen/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zum virtuellen Schengenraum:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2011/04/26/datenschmuggel-ist-ein-verbrechen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2011/04/26/datenschmuggel-ist-ein-verbrechen/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Die Kulturwertmark by Benedikt</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/04/die-kulturwertmark/comment-page-1/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>Benedikt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2245#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>Herzlichen Dank für diesen Beitrag und die theoretische Einbettung des ccc-Vorschlags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herzlichen Dank für diesen Beitrag und die theoretische Einbettung des ccc-Vorschlags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Die Kulturwertmark by Linkwertig: Kulturwertmark, Amazon Checkout, Bigpoint, Wikipedia » netzwertig.com</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/04/die-kulturwertmark/comment-page-1/#comment-2901</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkwertig: Kulturwertmark, Amazon Checkout, Bigpoint, Wikipedia » netzwertig.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=2245#comment-2901</guid>
		<description>[...] Werk zur Verfügung stellen und dafür um Entlohnung bitten oder auch eine feste Summe fordern.» Die Kulturwertmark » Kulturwertmark – 20 Jahre zurück&#160;Amazon Amazon Checkout ist nun auch in Deutschland [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Werk zur Verfügung stellen und dafür um Entlohnung bitten oder auch eine feste Summe fordern.» Die Kulturwertmark » Kulturwertmark – 20 Jahre zurück&nbsp;Amazon Amazon Checkout ist nun auch in Deutschland [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Consciousness? Let&#8217;s decide by having a vote. by Benedikt</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/03/what-is-consciousness-lets-decide-by-having-a-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Benedikt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=1920#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!

A cognitivist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>A cognitivist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent Linkage 11 by Stephan Packard</title>
		<link>http://www.signifyingmedia.net/2011/03/recent-linkage-11/comment-page-1/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Packard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signifyingmedia.net/?p=1686#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>Bulletproof indeed. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netzpolitik.org/2011/ist-denn-twitter-auch-sicher/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aber ist es auch sicher?&lt;/a&gt; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bulletproof indeed. <a href="http://www.netzpolitik.org/2011/ist-denn-twitter-auch-sicher/" rel="nofollow">Aber ist es auch sicher?</a> :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

